English | 简体 | 繁體 Sign Up Now | Log In | Help | Add favorite | Expo-Sourcing
PackSourcing
Your location:Home » Information Center
Sainsbury's faces court date
2010-09-17

 packagingnews.co.uk

 

Sainsbury's faces court date over excess packaging

 

 

Sainsbury's is set to become the first supermarket to be taken to court for breaching the 2003 Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations.

 

Lincolnshire Trading Standards has claimed the retailer broke the legislation with a beef roasting joint from its Taste the Difference range that was bought at a shop in Lincoln earlier this year.

 

The retailer is facing a potential fine of between £500 and £3,000.

 

Peter Heafield, head of trading standards, told the Lincolnshire Echo the body had a duty to enforce the regulations.

 

"Following a customer complaint about a product available at Sainsbury’s, trading standards carried out an investigation that has resulted in the matter being brought to court," he said.

 

Sainsbury's surprised by court date
In a statement, a Sainsbury’s spokesperson expressed surprise at the comments that did not reflect the very positive outcome of our meeting with Lincolnshire’s packaging team.

 

"In fact, we have been informed that the council, in light of that meeting, is currently looking again at whether it will proceed," the spokesperson said.

 

"We were particularly surprised, as the packaging of the product in question has been reduced by 53 per cent since February and is set to be reduced by at least another 10 per cent within the next few months."

 

Sainsbury’s said packaging was essential to ensure food remains fresh and undamaged, thereby preventing food waste and that it was committed to finding ways to reduce it while ensuring it remained functional.

 

According to the Lincolnshire Echo, the court case will take place on 12 October.

 

Trading Standards officers have previously called for the government to close loopholes in the legislation, particularly with regard to "consumer acceptance" which has been described as a get out for companies.

 

Previous prosecutions under the regulations include Computer 2000 Distribution, which had to pay £2,886 in costs and video games firm Powerplay that was fined £3,250.

Claims
The copyrights of articles in the website belong to authors. Please inform us if there is any violation of intellectual property and we will delete the articles immediately.
About Us | Trade Manual | User's Guide | Payment | Career Opportunities | Exchange Web Links | Advertisement | Contact